You know what? I give up. They win. I do know everything.
The cleverer give in.
You know what? I give up. They win. I do know everything.
and thats why evolution can't be considered scientific fact.
@Civ2
There are no Facts in scientific method. Facts are the observables period.
Hypothesis is arranging the facts. Theory is conclusions based on the arrangement. This allows further hypothesis as apposed to a Fact that later "can" be proved wrong.
You cannot tell them Genesis is a Fact. It was not revealed (to scientist) as an observable. That "record" has been tainted, and proven wrong.
On the other Hand, today, scientist think that theory came first and then creationist realized that the Bible does not fit any more so now they are attacking ToE.
Reality check here: The "record" did come first, and Mr Darwin made the mistake of trying to adapt science to the "record". Thus failing, modern science would not give up and kept trying. Now that they have more "evidence", they no longer need the "record". Therefore the "record" can be relegated to myth.
I do not think that "origin" was ever meant to replace God. It is just the natural evolution of that vein of research. There did come a point where the Why has been blurred with the How. Neither are relative any more. For 2000 years religion has blurred the world view lense. Globalization has almost wiped out that "fact". It is almost like humans have thrown off the curse of babel and once more reached out and have "become" godlike.
timtofly
I'm not even talking about Genesis or any other religious points.
(And that's the MAIN point where they are wrong. I was disillusioned about evolution back then in school, when I wasn't yet "too religious".)
Evolution doesn't make much sense (and is 100% unprovable) from the "normal" point of view!!!
All they say is "it should've been that way - look, my dog is here, so he must've evolved".
Which is nonsense and will remain such regardless of how much "science points" you will put on it.
kramer
I couldn't care less about the WORDS/FORMULAS/REASONS you give about how the rock falls.
All I need is to SEE IT FALLING.
And in evolution - this is IMPOSSIBLE!!!
For anyone!!!
Ever!!!
Got my point of why I do not consider it any more then a "theory"???
IF post contains a tiny agreement with your position
THEN inflate this agreement into complete victory
ELSE IF post disagrees with you THEN
IF arguments are understood THEN raise your standards
ELSE repeat what you've posted earlier
And many theists support evolution.even some atheists doubt evolution.
More importantly how in the world did a species survive repeated inbreeding like that? Go ahead, take two animals and exclusively breed them over and over with themselves, their children, the children with their siblings and their siblings offspring. See what happens and gets back to me. You say evolution is unbelievable? THAT much inbreeding much less believable, and you suggest humanity survived it TWICE.Civ2, I'm waiting for a full skeletal record of Adam and Even to prove the Creation and for genetic data supporting the supposition that Sarah was 90+ when she gave birth. Otherwise, it never happened.
Civ2, I'm waiting for a full skeletal record of Adam and Even to prove the Creation and for genetic data supporting the supposition that Sarah was 90+ when she gave birth. Otherwise, it never happened.
he isn't trying to force it down your throat, evolutionists want to make everyone believe what they say.
I couldn't care less about the WORDS/FORMULAS/REASONS you give about how the rock falls.
All I need is to SEE IT FALLING.
And in evolution - this is IMPOSSIBLE!!!
For anyone!!!
Ever!!!
Wrong. We just want to keep science classes to, you know, science.he isn't trying to force it down your throat, evolutionists want to make everyone believe what they say.
I cant speak for others, but frankly I dont mind if you want to believe biblical books over science, go for it, your loss. What I mind, and what originally started this thread, is an attempt to trade time spent teaching science for time spent teaching religion, especially when the arguments are built on the backs of such terrible logic.he isn't trying to force it down your throat, evolutionists want to make everyone believe what they say.
_____ being complicated is not a justification of something being done by God. Most of the things we easily understand today used to be blamed on gods because they were "too hard" to understand. The sun, the tides, weather, chemistry, the planets, physiology, etc. If everyone took that line of logic, we'd still think you got sick because you angered the gods, that weather was dictated by pleasing higher authority, the sun was dragged across the sky by a chariot, etc. if you want to go home and tell your kid your personal beliefs fine, but that doesnt mean its science or that it belongs in a classroom
He isnt JUST that, but is often used as a blunt instrument to explain the "unexplainable".God is not just an explanation for what we don't know, look at any religion.
Yup. Evolution became the cornerstone of biology because someone in your school said dogs must have evolved, and that therefore the ToE is real. They also disproved God by saying that if there was a bearded man in the sky, we would've been able to see him.Evolution doesn't make much sense (and is 100% unprovable) from the "normal" point of view!!!
All they say is "it should've been that way - look, my dog is here, so he must've evolved".
WhyI couldn't care less about the WORDS/FORMULAS/REASONS you give about how the rock falls.
All I need is to SEE IT FALLING.
And in evolution - this is IMPOSSIBLE!!!
But a "theory" isn't... we've already told you ten times that... for goodness' sake, do you even read our... wha... b...Got my point of why I do not consider it any more then a "theory"???
What makes this analogy so fantastic is that once upon a time Christians did believe that things fell because it was God's willNope that isnt enough. They need to see the rock fall, and then they need scientists to show me what gravity actually looks like. We must demand to SEE gravity. Otherwise you cant prove its not just God pulling the rock down. Intelligent gravity is truth defacto because science cant provide 100% total utter evidence anything else causes it IMO.
So that's why you prefer your religion over "evolutionism" -- because Christians have never cared what others have thought of them and would never, ever, try to sway anyone to their view or "go out to save souls", no way, no how.he isn't trying to force it down your throat, evolutionists want to make everyone believe what they say.
Prayer does not work ... science does
![]()
I don't see the Moon falling. In fact it's getting further away. By about 3.78cm a year.
Gravity? LIES.