The end of Civ3 is now here.

[Gojira54]

My apologies for lashing out at you, Bjornlo. I was in the worst of moods, and was (in my mind) lashing out at the general populace of naysayers that pop up every time a new version arises. I didn't intend on it being a personal attack, but looking back on it I can see that you can take it that way. I do stand by the logic that I did put into the argument, but apologize for framing in the way I did.

Civ4 is a mixed bag, but the potential for greatness is much more than there is in Civ3. I tend to see things from a modding perspective more than a players, and being a programmer the possibility of building my own game loosely based on Civ4 has me pretty jazzed.

At any rate, sorry for the misdirected grumpiness.

 

[Yorgos]

Has anyone posted a poll for a comparison between civ3 and civ4? This should be interesting, if we have a link in both forums (we don't want only civ3 funs to vote, don't we?)

 

[Plotinus]

Oh, what a thought. Don't encourage it!

 

[WildWeazel]

Make sure you include a "they both r0x0rs and I will play them both for years to come" option.

 

[Sword_Of_Geddon]

I will post this poll lol?

 

[okemah]

After buying CivIV, and seeing the great graphics, I played it for a while, but soon lost interest. I relized I had become an observer, an most play was being done by the computer, great graphics, no content... I soon found myself loading Conquests, and playing it again...

 

[Supa]

Raaaaaaaah

 

[WildWeazel]

You don't have to click the flashing buttons...
I've gone back to C3C a few times, but just because I have a few good games going that I don't want to abandon. When I lose interest in Civ4, I just play C3C for a while and then come back. It always works.

@Supa: what was that?