Which would be worse? Someone draining your bank account or someone putting a gun to your head?
second, that one was a violent crime while the other was simply fraud. However, that being said, I sympathize with what you're trying to say. In the end, the bottom line is that we can tolerate crimes of greed far more than we tolerate crimes of desperation.
I would support the shorter sentence for the rich person, so long as it was in a common prison. Lets see how long he could survive. Could become an interesting reality show.Only 3 years in a massage-my-back prison for stealing $3 billion? Should be at least a year per $100 million!
That's capitalism for you; grab as much as you can for as little effort as possible. You're just jealous because he can play the market better than you.And if I remember right. That homeless person has been stealing/robbing small amounts of money to get thrown in jail for food and a place to sleep for YEARS! The judge did go overboard with that ruling. but was just likely sick of seeing that same guy in the courts every few months.
Compare these two stories and tell me with a straight face there is no injustice and bias in sentencing versus the poor and white collar criminals.
Story1
Story2
Sure maybe I don't know all the facts but at face value how is it fair that a homeless man stealing to get food gets 15 years while a white collar criminal who defrauded many people only gets 40 months? It's disgusting..
Wasn't an armed robbery. Didn't hold a gun to someone's head.
Years of studying others pulling off that stunt.If you don't know all the facts, then how can you form an accurate opinion on whats going on? Just wondering....
Hey, EAV didn't like Waldheim or Haider. Good enough for me.my hatred for your culture is rapidly approaching its midpoint.
Armed robbery is considered worse than fraud because the latter involves directly threatening the lives of others.
Which would be worse? Someone draining your bank account or someone putting a gun to your head?