Months ago, Biden was irrelevant polling 5thThat is from months ago, just fyi
Months ago, Biden was irrelevant polling 5thThat is from months ago, just fyi
Months ago, Biden was irrelevant polling 5th
It's not a conspiracy
FixedIt's ok, let people hope those clips, along with the worse ones where Biden curses at voters who are just citizens spewing bullfeathers, won't come up in the election debates.
Just keep in mind that the Biden campaign had no money compared to Bernie and spent far less money on Super Tuesday campaigning, including IIRC NO money on ads in Minnesota in the Super Tuesday run-up. He had essentially no campaign organization whatsoever in several states due to a lack of funds. So although its easy/tempting to paint Biden as the "big money" establishment candidate, going against the "little guy" Bernie... the reality is that Sanders' campaign had (and still has) a lot more money than Biden's and spent a ton more money chasing the nomination than Biden did.So I mean it terms of super delegate type level membership. The one's with job listings as DNC members and while I agree with you that voting preferences being what they are currently Biden is going to win naturally, it does not change the fact that the DNC has long loathed the progressive side of their party. they rightfully view them as anti corporation and rich donor which means they hurt the bribery part of the DNC grift and they (I believe wrongfully but clearly its more debatable than I thought 3 weeks ago) view the progressive part of their platform as unpopular.
I'm gonna push back a little on this thought because it seems to me that this is another example of what I referenced earlier... blaming the non-supporters for the failure... when its the responsibility of those who support the position to carry it to success, not those who oppose it. And you seem to see this clearly when it comes to Bernie supporters being blamed if Biden fails... but then you take the opposite position when it comes to blaming conservatives for progressives' failures and blaming Biden supporters for Bernie's failures.Because conservatives torpedo everything they propose and then people ask, "Why couldn't you pass any progressive policies?" and blame the progressives instead of the conservatives
OK. So are those are individual Americans right? So are you saying that they aren't allowed to have or express a preference for a POTUS candidate?The DNC is made up of 447 members currently, chosen by the party bureaucracy at the National and State levels with no required or binding input by, or accountability to, rank and file party members.
OK. So are those are individual Americans right? So are you saying that they aren't allowed to have or express a preference for a POTUS candidate?
Bernie has no chill. I voted for him.I'm not what you call happy about it either. I really thought Bernie had a shot to win this thing. And I still think beating Trump in November is gonna be an uphill battle for whomever the nominee ends up being. But the fact is the voters have repudiated Bernie in a pretty big way and we need to figure out why that is and how not to repeat it, and how to capitalize on the majorities of Democrats who back Bernie's policies even if they don't seem to have been willing to vote for the man himself.
As leftists we should know that electoral politics isn't going to be an easy arena to succeed in. Bourgeois democracy is rigged; we know this. Instead of complaining about it and acting surprised we need to figure out how we win anyway.
Why? AOC and Bernie are public officials and representatives of the Democratic party, so I fully expect them to endorse Biden once he is nominated. I mean, Bernie literally said he would endorse and campaign for the eventual nominee, regardless of who it is. Same thing he did in 2016... because he has integrity.Boy, you're really not gonna like it when Sanders (and e.g. AOC) inevitably endorses Biden.
Dude, I literally don't care.But I, even though not being a Boomer, will view your posts on this regard as empty bigotry and not to be given any weight, value, or credence, and encourage others to do the same.
It's hypocritical morality. If it really were about saving people's lives they'd simply ban tobacco cultivation and importation outright. It's only been a couple of centuries since it became a habit outside the Americas, so it's not something that's ‘been around since Biblical times’ and therefore excusable, but, as I said, it's hypocrites being hypocrites.I'd rather have no tickets for smoking OR drinking on the street. land of the free my ass.
although I can actually understand it more for smoking, at least smoking has secondhand smoke as a negative factor - what's drinking? oldschool puritan morality? drinking is a sin and nobody should see you do it in public? public drunkenness is fine, that can stay ticketed/illegal but open container for a legal adult is loads of bull. change my mind? I don't even drink except at home so no dog in this fight it just doesn't make sense to me.
Here's a thought: why not hold elections on non-working days? Here they're always on a Sunday and there's mandatory enrollment, so anything below 70% turnout is considered a problem.Most states offer some paid time off to complete a vote.
Links? There was one two posts above the one which you quoted:I’ve heard this, but yet to see objective evidence that points to Republican malevolence as the culprit.Intentionally making it more difficult for persons/demographics who are more likely to oppose your party to vote is a pretty simple/straightforward definition of voter suppression... which the Republicans are disproportionately doing/attempting all over the country.
True, so are the people in Mississippi. A Mississippi Senator was even caught suggesting it outright:
Bernie just announced he's staying in until the end.
The discrepancies in Bolivia's election made the difference between a runoff election which Morales assumed he would not win and a first-round victory with a sort-of FPTP system. And it was fraud (we have a thread for that); now whom would it concern if there was this 11% discrepancy in the DNC nomination election?ou know, when Bolivia had an exit poll discrepancy of 2% last year, the US was calling for intervention, but now that there is a 11% discrepancy in the Democratic party "election", suddenly there is total silence.
It's good for setting up foundations for the future of the movement to try and pull the DNC back towards something recognisable as ‘left’ outside the U.S. of A.'s rarified political system. If he can pull it off.Bernie's strategy, I think, is simply to show up at the convention with as many voters as possible to say 'Yes, we're here, and yes, we're not going away, so even though I'm not the nominee, and I'll fully support the nominee, you can't just ignore us'.
Which I can respect. He has all but affirmed he knows Biden will get it. But damn the party if he won't show them there is some support behind him and his policies, and that won't go away.
Lack of access to polls is a feature of the system, not a bug.Here's a thought: why not hold elections on non-working days? Here they're always on a Sunday and there's mandatory enrollment, so anything below 70% turnout is considered a problem.
You tell 'em! That'll teach them bad dems! Feel your power! Make them pay! Re-elect Trump!In any case, I am not voting for Biden. I held my nose and voted for Hillary, but if the Democratic party is taking my vote for granted, while pushing policies which directly make my life worse, they won't get my vote again. I have always voted Democrat because they are supposedly "the good guys", except I have finally realized they aren't. The are the same corrupt cronies who will not give a single damn about people like me. They feel entitled to my vote, but they won't get it anymore. I now understand why so many people voted for Trump, and I might do the same out of spite. I just cancelled my Democratic party affiliation and will happily watch it all burn down and dance on its ashes. #DemExit