onejayhawk
Afflicted with reason
That's a pretty bold prediction. I can't see Trump carrying angry white males by any larger margin than Romney did.
Why not? That is exactly what he appears to be doing. Substantially larger.
J
That's a pretty bold prediction. I can't see Trump carrying angry white males by any larger margin than Romney did.
Why not? That is exactly what he appears to be doing. Substantially larger.
J
He only needs to do that well with whites in places like Ohio and Florida, not the US as a whole. As for NH, again, this is not so much Trump alone as a spoiler effect from a write-in campaign by the Bernie or Bust crowd.
Admittedly, this was my worst-while-still-being-plausable case scenario for HRC. I believe I have on this board, if not this thread, said that a HRC v Trump scenario with no splinter groups would look like 2008/2012, the best case for her being the addition of Georgia, Arizona, and perhaps Missouri.
I will cosign that Joecoolyo has made a prediction... and a bold ballsy one at that. I think he's wrong but that's the point. Make real predictions and be clearly right or clearly wrong. No waffling or hedging. I salute you sir![]()
The one thing I think your maps are missing is Clinton's chance at winning Arkansas (her "home" state).That being said, if you wanted to argue that Clinton, if she campaigned and executed well, could pull off Georgia in a three-way race, I wouldn't argue too hard.
Unlikely. Trump is to Prez Reagan as Dennis Rodman is to Michael Jordan. Hes a niche player, the best at what he does, and also great at attracting tons of attention, pissing people off, and selling tons of sneakers and jerseys... but he ain't leading the team to a finals win.To actually win I'd bet he will need a Reaganesque 34 point margin among non Hispanic whites.
So, would this go in a scenario that Trump breaks his pact with the GOP to not run as an independent if he loses the nomination? Since I recall some time ago that he agreed to such a pact in the early stages of the nomination process.If the GOP splits, either by the GOP leadership denying Trump causing him to run as an independent or by Trump getting the nomination and the GOP leadership running an independent candidate, then Hillary will win in a landslide rivaling Nixon's trouncing of McGovern.
Romney won the white vote by TWENTY points. How much better do you expect Trump, or anyone else, could possibly do?
Trump is capable of making gains among nonwhite voters in ways that Romney wasn't.
Okay, I'll bite. How?
So, would this go in a scenario that Trump breaks his pact with the GOP to not run as an independent if he loses the nomination? Since I recall some time ago that he agreed to such a pact in the early stages of the nomination process.
IF that happens, I think
1) there is violence at the convention
2) Donald Trump runs as a third party, and wins multiple deep south states.
Okay, I'll bite. How?
Mitt Romney couldn't codeswitch away from elitist WASP, but Trump is a reality TV star. With nomination in hand Trump will be free to convincingly pander to blue-collar, yet democratic crowds (ie he'll be more relatable as a candidate).
Relatable? We were talking about him making inroads with the non-white vote. You were saying he had access that Romney lacked. So far his "access" appears to be that he has gone wildly out of his way to make most people believe he is a further out of the closet white supremacist than any candidate since Wallace. Please, do tell how he is going to "codeswitch" out of that.
He helped Republicans believe he was Republican this year, despite being left-of-center in previous election years (especially with financial contributions). His seemingly racist personality is a facade entended to ensnare a portion of his targeted audiences.
International Business Times said:According to an International Business Times review of data from Political Moneyline, Trump has given nearly $1.5 million to GOP candidates and political groups on the federal level since 1979. The billionaire has donated roughly $405,000 to Democratic politicians and committees during that same span of time.