New leader elimination

Morningcalm forgot to take my votes into account, so Yongle should be at 12 and Henry IV at 17
Sorry; I copy/pasted your post via iPhone so I could write in my own votes, but didn't change the numbers. Fixed now. XD
 
Al-Mansur 12
Yongle 12 + 1 = 13 He was known more than just being Zheng He's patron; Yongle also commissioned the largest print encyclopedia pre-Internet and refused a tribute of castrated boys
Ramesses II 22
Cardinal Richelieu 13
Henry IV (France) 18
Shah Jahan 3 - 3 = ELIMINATED He was close to being an Islamic fundamentalist ruling a primarily Hindu jurisdiction
Shivaji 16
Constantine 17
Alexander Nevsky 15
Ur-Nammu 26
 
Al-Mansur 12
Yongle 13
Ramesses II 22
Cardinal Richelieu 13-3=10 - France needs a second leader, but one should be enough, and Henry IV would make a better choice.
Henry IV (France) 18
Shivaji 16
Constantine 17
Alexander Nevsky 15
Ur-Nammu 26+1=27 - A perfect choice for a second leader of Sumer.
 
Al-Mansur (12+1)=13 Adds a more builder orientated gameplay to Arabia
Yongle 13
Ramesses II 22
Cardinal Richelieu (10-3)=7 Yeah, I prefer Henry IV as a French leader. Richelieu might be too similar to de Medici.
Henry IV (France) 18
Shivaji 16
Constantine 17
Alexander Nevsky 15
Ur-Nammu 27
 
Al-Mansur 13
Yongle 13
Ramesses II 22
Cardinal Richelieu 7 + 1 = 8 Why the sudden Richelieu hate? So long as he's not implemented with another espionage-based LA he should be fine, right?
Henry IV (France) 18
Shivaji 16
Constantine 17 - 3 = 14 Rome, led by the one who abandoned Rome? Um, why?
Alexander Nevsky 15
Ur-Nammu 27
 
Al-Mansur 13
Yongle 13
Ramesses II 22
Cardinal Richelieu 8-3=5 - Henry IV would be better French leader.
Henry IV (France) 18
Shivaji 16
Constantine 14
Alexander Nevsky 15
Ur-Nammu 27+1=28 - While not the most necessary, Sumeria is a Civ where I would quite like to see a second leader, and mod would be a perfect way to make it. And Ur-Nammu is the best choice for the alternate leader of Sumer.
 
Al-Mansur (13+1)=14 I'm ok with him being a Mod leader, he's significant enough
Yongle (13-3)=10 Not fond of naval China or the Ming Dynasty
Ramesses II 22
Cardinal Richelieu 5
Henry IV (France) 18
Shivaji 16
Constantine 14
Alexander Nevsky 15
Ur-Nammu 28
 
Al-Mansur 14
Yongle 10
Ramesses II 22
Cardinal Richelieu 5 - 3 = 2 I would rather have Henry
Henry IV (France) 18
Shivaji 16
Constantine 14
Alexander Nevsky 15
Ur-Nammu 28 + 1 = 29 Heading for 30! Again!
 
Al-Mansur 14
Yongle 10
Ramesses II 22
Cardinal Richelieu ELIMINATED (2-3)
Henry IV (France) 19 (18+1)

Shivaji 16
Constantine 14
Alexander Nevsky 15
Ur-Nammu 28 + 1 = 29 Heading for 30! Again!
 
Al-Mansur 14
Yongle 10
Ramesses II 22
Henry IV (France) 19
Shivaji 16 + 1 = 17 (An excellent ruler mightily accomplished who would add a military angle to India)
Constantine 14 - 3 = 11 (While an interesting ruler, numerous others here are more so, and Rome doesn't need yet another leader)
Alexander Nevsky 15
Ur-Nammu 29
 
Al-Mansur 14
Yongle 10 + 1 = 11 I seem to have a habit of starting to like leaders at the same time as everyone else starts pouring on the minus threes. But anyway, naval China sounds interesting, and there's nothing to say that naval mechanics won't be improved some time in the next few years.
Ramesses II 22
Henry IV (France) 19
Shivaji 17
Constantine 11 - 3 = 8 Almost there...
Alexander Nevsky 15
Ur-Nammu 29
 
Al-Mansur 14
Yongle 11
Ramesses II 22
Henry IV (France) 19
Shivaji 17
Constantine 8
Alexander Nevsky 15-3=12 - My interest in a second Russian leader is just lower compared to the others here.
Ur-Nammu 29+1=30 - Back in the 30 club where he belongs.
 
Al-Mansur 14
Yongle (11-3)=8 Cruel man, not a fan of him, his successors discontinued the treasure fleet and were isolationists. Ming Dynasty stinks!
Ramesses II 22
Henry IV (France) 19
Shivaji (17+1)=18 Maratha's Greatest leader
Constantine 8
Alexander Nevsky 12
Ur-Nammu 30
 
Al-Mansur 14
Yongle 8 - 3 = 5 (Gameplay-wise, naval China would be dull, even with an exploration/wealth layer attached to it to represent the Treasure Fleet. Historically, his rise to power was distinctly un-Confucian and treacherous. He did not deserve to rule China.)
Ramesses II 22
Henry IV (France) 19
Shivaji 18 + 1 = 19 (Unjustly not as famous as he ought to be. What a warrior (fought the Mughals). What a ruler!)
Constantine 8
Alexander Nevsky 12
Ur-Nammu 30
 
Al-Mansur 14
Yongle 5 - 3 = 2 Even though China needs another leader, they'll have to wait. Th
Ramesses II 22
Henry IV (France) 19
Shivaji 19
Constantine 8
Alexander Nevsky 12 + 1 = 13 I believe that Russia needs a second leader.
Ur-Nammu 30
 
Al-Mansur 14
Yongle 2
Ramesses II 22
Henry IV (France) 19
Shivaji 19
Constantine 8 - 3 = 5 So it looks like pretty much everyone I've given points to has either been eliminated or will be very shortly. At the very least Constantine will fall eventually...
Alexander Nevsky 13 + 1 = 14 See my previous comments about Cardinal Richelieu.
Ur-Nammu 30
 
Al-Mansur 14
Yongle 2-3=-1 (ELIMINATED) - I think that Yongle would make a good alternate Chinese leader with Yongle Encyclopedia being a nice leader bonus, but his end is inevitable, so I'll end his suffering. After all, eighth place isn't that bad.
Ramesses II 22
Henry IV (France) 19+1=20 - Good king Henry would definitely make a good alternative French leader.
Shivaji 19
Constantine 5
Alexander Nevsky 14
Ur-Nammu 30
 
Al-Mansur 14
Ramesses II 22
Henry IV (France) 20
Shivaji (19+1)=20 A good alt leader for India
Constantine (5-3)=2 Don't care much about him, his role in making Christianity an official religion doesn't help him.
Alexander Nevsky 14
Ur-Nammu 30
 
Al-Mansur 14
Ramesses II 22 + 1 = 23 Return of Ozymandias
Henry IV (France) 20
Shivaji 20
Constantine 2 - 3 = ELIMINATED Just by making Christianity the official religion slowly led to the fall of the Roman Empire
Alexander Nevsky 14
Ur-Nammu 30
 
Top Bottom