So, what happens if after decades of painful readjustment to the new dates someone finds an even older calendar? Kill us? Him? Someone?
Construction of the first super carrier then?Oh hell no. Over my dead body do we use the beginning of the UN as a new calender.
Honestly, who cares about the NX-01?Sorry Park, but Sill is right. If we're going Star Trek, the NX-01 launched in 2151.
This series never existed. *drinks brain bleach*![]()
I think he looks sad.
This is for YOUR benefit, El Mac! If we can be in negative numbers now, you will be able to tell your great-great-great-great-great-great-great-repeat 100 more times-grandchildren that, yes, you were in fact alive before year zero (which the new calender will have.) You -will- still be alive then, I assume...Why're so many people trying to put year zero so near to us? That requires a host of negative numbers for most of history!
El_Mac, posting 13.7 billion years after the Big Bang, year 2012 of the Common Era
Because the first Captain of the Enterprise was Robert April, and his First Officer was Sarah Poole (whom he later married). This was established in the early '70s, in the Animated Series episode "The Counter-Clock Incident."I get that Enterprise had its flaws (although I'd make the case that many fans underrate it), but why shouldn't it be considered legitimate Star Trek?
Because the first Captain of the Enterprise was Robert April, and his First Officer was Sarah Poole (whom he later married). This was established in the early '70s, in the Animated Series episode "The Counter-Clock Incident."