Trump's statements and promises

Seth Meyers was strong, imo.
 
Reality of life can play jokes too (includes Seth Mayers):
 
Last edited:
Why is "Trump" in all-caps? Is it like in old Bibles, how they used to write it "GOD" and "JESUS"?
 
Why is "Trump" in all-caps? Is it like in old Bibles, how they used to write it "GOD" and "JESUS"?

As Priebus and Republican National Committee co-chair Sharon Day said:

Over two millennia ago, a new hope was born into the world, a Savior who would offer the promise of salvation to all mankind. Just as the three wise men did on that night, this Christmas heralds a time to celebrate the good news of a new King.

Trump is the new Messiah.
 
So Trump at 2011 calls for stopping Gaddafi killing people in his country and Trump at 2016 says the intervention was a huge mistake. This can be viewed from many sides and discussed in many aspects

Trump was ALWAYS against the war in Libyra and Iraq
(except for the times he wasnt)

Its nice to claim you had foresight, wisdom and poltical competence and are always right. When we have videos showing the opposite. but its Trumpland now facts dont matter
Saddly for us History repeats
 
Last edited:
Why is "Trump" in all-caps? Is it like in old Bibles, how they used to write it "GOD" and "JESUS"?
All I know, is that the Bible written in Trumps speaking style would be the best thing ever.
"You know what the rabbi's are saying? They are saying Jesus is not a very nice period. Jesus is a very nice person. When Jesus becomes the messiah they would be locked up because the rabbis have said some very hurtful things about me. Believe me."
 
There are some of his supporters that are like this, but I don't think they constitute the majority of those who voted for him. Like I've said before, I think most of the votes for Trump were really just anti-Hillary votes more than they were pro-Trump votes.

From personal experience with Trump-voting friends, a lot of it was an anti-SJW/anti-BLM-violence/anti-anti-white-cismale/etc. sort of reaction. Basically just a large, elaborate middle finger.

I refused to vote for him, but of those that did, I found that was the recurring reason among my friends.
 
If you have a tiny hands and short name what else you are supposed to do?


There may be some truth in there:

There have been some good times too in the past...

Although i don't like much of what Putin does, it is really not fair to compare Trump to him, cause at least Putin is clearly a very intelligent and eloquent person ;)
 
Which is how most politicians approach
From personal experience with Trump-voting friends, a lot of it was an anti-SJW/anti-BLM-violence/anti-anti-white-cismale/etc. sort of reaction. Basically just a large, elaborate middle finger.

I refused to vote for him, but of those that did, I found that was the recurring reason among my friends.

Did you point out to any of them how ridiculous a reason that is to vote for a president?
 
Did you point out to any of them how ridiculous a reason that is to vote for a president?

Those are ridiculous reasons to vote for a candidate, but I would venture to guess most people base their votes on ridiculous reasons.
 
Trump says that despite the--what is it now, 16?--the 16 U.S. intelligence agencies who have concluded it was the Russians who hacked the U.S. election, Trump has his own source which is telling him differently. Trump now KNOWS who the true culprit is. He will tell us on Tuesday or Wednesday. :scan:
 
I don't know why everyone has such a hard time figuring out what Trump will do. His personality has been obvious for months before the election because he makes no effort to hold back anything. He is a lying, manipulative SOB who ran for president for ego. The only thing consistent about him is that he will do in his presidency whatever is best for himself, to enrich himself and to increase his power by whatever means are possible. All the promises he makes on behalf of others are just for show, and he has already broken many of them before even entering office. Also, it's quite obvious that he's a lackey of Putin, whether because of personal admiration or because he is himself manipulated by him. That's what you can expect from the next 4 years -- legislation that enriches Trump, increases his power, either as president, or personally. You can expect any shady dealings that increase his wealth and power. You can expect him to turn a blind eye to any Russian transgressions, and if we're lucky, he won't defecate on the Constitution before he's out of office. He's got Congress eating out of his tiny hands (majority Republican) he's got a vacancy on the SC that he can fill with his man, making it majority Republican, and he's got a fan base that eats out of his tiny hands too. This is better than a tyrant's wet dream.
 
the Russians who hacked the U.S. election,

That is ( intentional ? ) misleading. All what is claimed is, that Russia hacked the DNC server and gave those e-mails to wiki leaks. That is not the same as ""Russia hacked the election" - but thanks to this framing, now half of the Democrats think, Russia hacked the voting machines ....


Because of the misleading framing, I would not thrust this claim. And even if Russia hacked the DNC server - this is still no proof that Russia gave those e-mails to wiki leaks. They could be hacked by 10 different hackers at different times and still wiki leaks could got the e - mails from an insider.
 
Just because the FBI and CIA said that Russia hacked the DNC
Along with Trump publicly calling for Russia to hack the DNC to find Hillarys speeches

That wasnt the damage, the damage was the Fake news spinning the hacked emails into stupid news stories that Republicans ate
From Clinton murdering FBI and hes family to Underage sex ring run from a pizza joint.
Everyone else looked at Clintons speech and was suprised that there was nothing there, and wonder why the secrecy ?

The other big problem is Russian Malware being found on US utilities computers
 
Last edited:
^Nope the real damage is the fact that no one tries to explain the rational core within these rumours or indeed defend from them at the court of law and simple reason seems to be that they are indefensible in the public open sitting before an independent jury.
 
^Nope the real damage is the fact that no one tries to explain the rational core within these rumours or indeed defend from them at the court of law and simple reason seems to be that they are indefensible in the public open sitting before an independent jury.

Da comrades, between the Russian IP fragments recovered from wiki leaks emails, numerous IP in DNC hack all leading back to know russian hacking groups and both intelligence agency in agreement over the involvement of Russia
ALL PUBLICLY AVALIABLE to the evil Western Media and widely published and discussed in great depth. Including how hard it will be to prosecute Russia for such actions

Given that Trump has outright refused to believe in Russian involvement, any trial let along a full scale investigation will never be carried out
 
Da comrades, between the Russian IP fragments recovered from wiki leaks emails, numerous IP in DNC hack all leading back to know russian hacking groups and both intelligence agency in agreement over the involvement of Russia
ALL PUBLICLY AVALIABLE to the evil Western Media and widely published and discussed in great depth. Including how hard it will be to prosecute Russia for such actions

Given that Trump has outright refused to believe in Russian involvement, any trial let along a full scale investigation will never be carried out
Nice rant but I prefer the word of an expert:
http://arstechnica.com/security/201...016-election-bitter-debate-likely-to-rage-on/
 
So the Russians are the problem? Lol:
 
Back
Top Bottom